4.7 Article

Contribution of heterotrophic bacterioplankton to cyanobacterial bloom formation in a tributary backwater area of the Three Gorges Reservoir, China

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 25, Issue 27, Pages 27402-27412

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-2790-8

Keywords

Phytoplankton; Bacterioplankton; Flow cytometer; Three Gorges Reservoir; Cyanobacterial bloom

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Plan of China [2017YFC0404705]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51509233, 51679226, 51861125204]
  3. Chongqing Science and Technology Commission [cstc2017jcyjAX0243]
  4. National Key S&T Project on Water Pollution Control and Treatment [2015ZX07103-007]
  5. Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, CAS [QYZDJSSWDQC008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated phytoplankton and bacterioplankton communities by flow cytometer in a tributary backwater area of the Three Gorges Reservoir, China. Samplings were conducted in two cyanobacterial bloom periods (May and August) and no algal-blooms period (November) of 2014, representing three different operational stages of the reservoir, i.e., reservoir discharge period, fluctuating period in the summer flood season, and high water level in the impoundment period. Phyto- and bacterioplankton exhibit a wide range of variability along the depth profiles of the water column. In the investigated two cyanobacterial bloom periods, prokaryotes accounted for over 50% of the total phytoplankton. As for bacterioplankton, low nucleic acid bacteria were dominant in August and November. A positive correlation was observed between phytoplankton (pico- and nanophytoplankton), Chl a, and bacterioplankton. High nucleic acid groups and prokaryotes were highly coupled in May and August, which indicated that this high nucleic acid group could probably contribute to the explanation of cyanobacterial bloom formation in this area.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available