4.7 Article

Analyses on influencing factors of airborne VOCS pollution in taxi cabins

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 21, Issue 22, Pages 12868-12882

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-014-3223-y

Keywords

Vehicles; Taxi cabins; Influencing factors; Volatile organic compounds (VOCS); In-car air pollution; Interior environment; Indoor air quality (IAQ)

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation [2013FZ080, KKSY201206158]
  2. key project for educational bureau of Yunnan Province in China [2013Z039]
  3. Chinese Society for Environmental Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Due to the long time in vehicular cabins, people have high exposure to the airborne volatile organic compounds (VOCS), which will lead to negative effects on human health. In order to analyze the influencing factors of in-car VOCS pollution concentrations, 38 taxis were investigated on the static and closed conditions. The interior air of taxis was collected through activated Tenax adsorption tubes, and the air samples were analyzed with thermally desorbed gas chromatograph. The average concentrations of in-car benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, styrene, butyl acetate, undecane, and total VOCS (TVOC) were 82.7, 212.3, 74.7, 182.3, 24.7, 33.5, 61.3, and 1,441.7 mu g/m(3), respectively. Furthermore, the VOCS and TVOC concentrations increase with the rise of in-car temperature and relative humidity, and decrease with the increase of car age and total mileage. In addition, the VOCS and TVOC concentrations are higher in vehicles with small cabins than in ones with big cabins, and change with different sampling sites and various vehicular grades. Finally, according to the multiple linear regression analysis and hierarchical cluster analysis, car age is the most important factor influencing airborne VOCS and TVOC pollution concentrations in vehicular cabins, followed by interior temperature and total mileage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available