4.7 Review

Wastewater treatment to enhance the economic viability of microalgae culture

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages 5096-5105

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-013-1791-x

Keywords

Cell immobilization; Microalgal consortia; Nutrient removal; Suspended cell cultures; Wastewater treatment

Funding

  1. Foundation for Science and Technology [SFRH/BPD/66721/2009]
  2. POPH-QREN [SFRH/BPD/66721/2009]
  3. FSE [SFRH/BPD/66721/2009]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BPD/66721/2009] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microalgae culture is still not economically viable and it presents some negative environmental impacts, concerning water, nutrient and energy requirements. In this context, this study aims to review the recent advances on microalgal cultures in wastewaters to enhance their economic viability. We focused on three different culture concepts: (1) suspended cell systems, (2) cell immobilization, and (3) microalgae consortia. Cultures with suspended cells are the most studied. The nutrient removal efficiencies are usually high for wastewaters of different sources. However, biomass harvesting is difficult and a costly process due to the small cell size and lower culture density. On the other hand, the cell immobilization systems showed to be the solution for this problem, having as main limitation the nutrient diffusion from bulk to cells, which results in a reduced nutrient removal efficiency. The consortium between microalgae and bacteria enhances the growth of both microorganisms. This culture concept showed to be a promising technology to improve wastewater treatment, regarding not only nutrient removal but also biomass harvesting by bioflocculation. The aggregation mechanism must be studied in depth to find the process parameters that would lead to an effective and cheap harvesting process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available