4.7 Article

Stability of 6:2 fluorotelomer sulfonate in advanced oxidation processes: degradation kinetics and pathway

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages 4634-4642

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-013-2389-z

Keywords

6:2 Fluorotelomer sulfonate; Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS); Alternative; Degradability; Mist suppressant

Funding

  1. National High-Tech Research and Development Program [2013AA06A305]
  2. National Environmental Protection Public Welfare Industry Targeted Research Fund [201309001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), a widely used mist suppressant in hard chrome electroplating industry, has been listed in the Stockholm Convention for global ban. 6:2 Fluorotelomer sulfonate (6:2 FTS) acid and salts have been adopted as alternative products in the market, but no data about their abiotic degradation has been reported. In the present study, the degradability of 6:2 FTS potassium salt (6:2 FTS-K) was evaluated under various advanced oxidation processes, including ultraviolet (UV) irradiation, UV with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), alkaline ozonation (O-3, pH = 11), peroxone (O-3/H2O2), and Fenton reagent oxidation (Fe2+/H2O2). UV/H2O2 was found to be the most effective approach, where the degradation of 6:2 FTS-K followed the pseudo-first-order kinetics. The intermediates were mainly shorter chain perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acid (C-7 to C-2), while sulfate (SO4 (2-)) and fluoride (F-) were found to be the final products. The high yields of SO4 (2-) and F- indicate that 6:2 FTS-K can be nearly completely desulfonated and defluorinated under UV/H2O2 condition. The degradation should firstly begin with the substitution of hydrogen atom by hydroxyl radicals, followed by desulfonation, carboxylation, and sequential flake off of CF2 unit. Compared with PFOS which is inert in most advanced oxidation processes, 6:2 FTS-K is more degradable as the alternative.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available