4.7 Article

Enhanced electrokinetic remediation of lead-contaminated soil by complexing agents and approaching anodes

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages 3126-3133

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-013-2274-9

Keywords

Enhanced electrokinetic remediation; Lead-contaminated soil; EDTA; Approaching anode; Chemical fractionation

Funding

  1. National Special Project on Water Pollution Control and Management [2012ZX07503-002]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Optimizing process parameters that affect the remediation time and power consumption can improve the treatment efficiency of the electrokinetic remediation as well as determine the cost of a remediation action. Lab-scale electrokinetic remediation of Pb-contaminated soils was investigated for the effect of complexant ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and acetic acid and approaching anode on the removal efficiency of Pb. When EDTA was added to the catholyte, EDTA dissolved insoluble Pb in soils to form soluble Pb-EDTA complexes, increasing Pb mobility and accordingly removal efficiency. The removal efficiency was enhanced from 47.8 to 61.5 % when the EDTA concentration was increased from 0.1 to 0.2 M, showing that EDTA played an important role in remediation. And the migration rate of Pb was increased to 72.3 % when both EDTA and acetic acid were used in the catholyte. The approaching anode electrokinetic remediation process in the presence of both EDTA and acetic acid had a higher Pb-removal efficiency with an average efficiency of 83.8 %. The efficiency of electrokinetic remediation was closely related to Pb speciation. Exchangeable and carbonate-bounded Pb were likely the forms which could be removed. All results indicate that the approaching anode method in the presence of EDTA and acetic acid is an advisable choice for electrokinetic remediation of Pb-contaminated soil.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available