4.7 Article

Core-shell magnetite-silica dithiocarbamate-derivatised particles achieve the Water Framework Directive quality criteria for mercury in surface waters

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 20, Issue 9, Pages 5963-5974

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-013-1615-z

Keywords

Mercury; Nanoporous; Titanosilicates; Magnetite particles; Dithiocarbamate functionalisation; Water treatment; Water Framework Directive

Funding

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT) [PTDC/CTM-NAN/120668/2010, SFRH/BPD/45156/2008]
  2. FSE
  3. POPH
  4. FCT
  5. FEDER [PEst-C/MAR/LA0017/2011, PEst-C/CTM/LA0011/2011]
  6. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BPD/45156/2008, PTDC/CTM-NAN/120668/2010] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The sorption capacity of nanoporous titanosilicate Engelhard titanosilicate number 4 (ETS-4) and silica-coated magnetite particles derivatised with dithiocarbamate groups towards Hg(II) was evaluated and compared in spiked ultra-pure and spiked surface-river water, for different batch factors. In the former, and using a batch factor of 100 m(3)/kg and an initial Hg(II) concentrations matching the maximum allowed concentration in an effluent discharge, both materials achieve Hg(II) uptake efficiencies in excess of 99 % and a residual metal concentration lower than the guideline value for drinking water quality. For the surface-river water and the same initial concentration, the Hg(II) uptake efficiency of magnetite particles is outstanding, achieving the quality criteria established by the Water Framework Directive (concerning Hg concentration in surface waters) using a batch factor of 50 m(3)/kg, while the efficiency of ETS-4 is significantly inferior. The dissimilar sorbents' Hg(II) removal efficiency is attributed to different uptake mechanisms. This study also highlights the importance of assessing the effective capacity of the sorbents under realistic conditions in order to achieve trustable results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available