4.8 Article

An Estimate of Natural Gas Methane Emissions from California Homes

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 52, Issue 17, Pages 10205-10213

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b03217

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We estimate postmeter methane (CH4) emissions from California's residential natural gas (NG) system using measurements and analysis from a sample of homes and appliances. Quiescent whole-house emissions (i.e., pipe leaks and pilot lights) were measured using a mass balance method in 75 California homes, while CH4 to CO2 emission ratios were measured for steady operation of individual combustion appliances and, separately, for transient operation of three tankless water heaters. Measured quiescent whole-house emissions are typically <1 g CH4/day, though they exhibit long-tailed gamma distributions containing values >10 g CH4/day. Most operating appliances yield undetectable CH4 to CO2 enhancements in steady operation (<0.01% of gas consumed), though storage water heaters and stovetops exhibit long-tailed gamma distributions containing high values (similar to 1-3% of gas consumed), and transients are observed for the tanldess heaters. Extrapolating results to the state-level using Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling combined with California housing statistics and gas use information suggests quiescent house leakage of 23.4 (13.7-45.6, at 95% confidence) Gg CH4, with pilot lights contributing similar to 30%. Emissions from steady operation of appliances and their pilots are 13.3 (6.6-37.1) Gg CH4/yr, an order of magnitude larger than current inventory estimates, with transients likely increasing appliance emissions further. Together, emissions from residential NG are 35.7 (21.7-64.0) Gg CH4/yr, equivalent to similar to 15% of California's NG CH4 emissions, suggesting leak repair, improvement of combustion appliances, and adoption of nonfossil energy heating sources can help California meet its 2050 climate goals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available