4.8 Article

Removal and Recovery of Heavy Metal Ions by Two-dimensional MoS2 Nanosheets: Performance and Mechanisms

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 52, Issue 17, Pages 9741-9748

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b01705

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [CBET-1565452, CBET-1706059]
  2. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated the removal of heavy metals from water by two-dimensional MoS2 nanosheets suspended in aqueous solution, and restacked as thin film membranes, respectively. From these studies we elucidated a new heavy metal ion removal mechanism that involves a reduction oxidation (redox) reaction between heavy metal ions and MoS2 nanosheets. Ag+ was used as a model species and MoS2 nanosheets were prepared via chemical exfoliation of bulk powder. We found that the Ag+ removal capacity of suspended MoS2 nanosheets was as high as similar to 4000 mg/g and adsorption accounted for less than 20% of removal, suggesting the reduction of Ag+ to metallic silver as a dominant removal mechanism. Furthermore, we demonstrated that MoS2 membranes were able to retain a similar high removal capacity, and attribute this capability to the formation of a conductive, permeable multilayer MoS2 structure, which enables a corrosion-type reaction involving electron transfer from a MoS2 site inside the membrane (anode) to another site on membrane surface (cathode) where heavy metal ions are reduced to metallic particles. The membrane surface remains active to efficiently recover metallic particles, because the primary oxidation products are soluble, nontoxic molybdate and sulfur species, which do not form an insulating oxide layer to passivate the membrane surface. Therefore, MoS2 membranes can be used effectively to remove and recover precious heavy metals from wastewater.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available