4.8 Article

Determination of Dew Point Conditions for CO2 with Impurities Using Microfluidics

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 48, Issue 6, Pages 3567-3574

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es404618y

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Carbon Management Canada
  2. Theme B: Emerging Technologies [B-04]
  3. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  4. Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI)
  5. DuPont Canada
  6. Queen Elizabeth II Scholarship in Science and Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Impurities can greatly modify the phase behavior of carbon dioxide (CO2), with significant implications on the safety and cost of transport in pipelines. In this paper we demonstrate a microfluidic approach to measure the dew point of such mixtures, specifically the point at which water in supercritical CO, mixtures condenses to a liquid state. The method enables direct visualization of dew formation (similar to 1-2 mu m diameter droplets) at industrially relevant concentrations, pressures, and temperatures. Dew point measurements for the well-studied case of pure CO2-water agreed well with previous theoretical and experimental data over the range of pressure (up to 13.17 MPa), temperature (up to 50 degrees C), and water content (down to 0.00229 mol fraction) studied. The microfluidic approach showed a nearly 3-fold reduction in error as compared to previous methods. When applied to a mixture with nitrogen (2.5%) and oxygen (5.8%) impurities typical of flue gas from natural gas oxy-fuel combustion processes the measured dew point pressure increased on average 17.55 +/- 5.4%, indicating a more stringent minimum pressure for pipeline transport. In addition to increased precision, the microfluidic method offers a direct measurement of dew formation, requires very small volumes (similar to 10 mu L), and is applicable to ultralow water contents (<0.005 mol fractions), circumventing the limits of previous methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available