4.8 Article

Incorporation of Uranium into Hematite during Crystallization from Ferrihydrite

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 48, Issue 7, Pages 3724-3731

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es500212a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U. K. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) BIGRAD consortium [NE/H007768/1]
  2. Diamond Light Source [SP7367, SP7593]
  3. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/H005617/1, NE/H006494/1, NE/H006494/2, NE/L000547/1, NE/H007768/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/K001752/1, ST/K001787/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. NERC [NE/H007768/1, NE/H005617/1, NE/H006494/1, NE/L000547/1, NE/H006494/2] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. STFC [ST/K001752/1, ST/K001787/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ferrihydrite was exposed to U(VI)-containing cement leachate (pH 10.5) and aged to induce crystallization of hematite. A combination of chemical extractions, TEM, and XAS techniques provided the first evidence that adsorbed U(VI) (approximate to 3000 ppm) was incorporated into hematite during ferrihydrite aggregation and the early stages of crystallization, with continued uptake occurring during hematite ripening. Analysis of EXAFS and XANES data indicated that the U(VI) was incorporated into a distorted, octahedrally coordinated site replacing Fe(III). Fitting of the EXAFS showed the uranyl bonds lengthened from 1.81 to 1.87 A, in contrast to previous studies that have suggested that the uranyl bond is lost altogether upon incorporation into hematite. The results of this study both provide a new mechanistic understanding of uranium incorporation into hematite and define the nature of the bonding environment of uranium within the mineral structure. Immobilization of U(VI) by incorporation into hematite has clear and important implications for limiting uranium migration in natural and engineered environments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available