4.8 Article

Life Cycle Environmental Impact of High-Capacity Lithium Ion Battery with Silicon Nanowires Anode for Electric Vehicles

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 48, Issue 5, Pages 3047-3055

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es4037786

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CBET-1351602]
  2. Research Growth Initiative (RGI) of University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
  3. Johnson Controls Inc.
  4. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  5. Directorate For Engineering [1351602] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although silicon nanowires (SiNW) have been widely studied as an ideal material for developing high-capacity lithium ion batteries (LIBs) for electric vehicles (EVs), little is known about the environmental impacts of such a new EV battery pack during its whole life cycle. This paper reports a life cycle assessment (LCA) of a high-capacity LIB pack using SiNW prepared via metal-assisted chemical etching as anode material. The LCA study is conducted based on the average U.S. driving and electricity supply conditions. Nanowastes and nanoparticle emissions from the SiNW synthesis are also characterized and reported. The LCA results show that over 50% of most characterized impacts are generated from the battery operations, while the battery anode with SiNW material contributes to around 15% of global warming potential and 10% of human toxicity potential. Overall the life cycle impacts of this new battery pack are moderately higher than those of conventional LIBs but could be actually comparable when considering the uncertainties and scale-up potential of the technology. These results are encouraging because they not only provide a solid base for sustainable development of next generation LIBs but also confirm that appropriate nanomanufacturing technologies could be used in sustainable product development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available