4.8 Article

Assessment of the Air-Soil Partitioning of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in a Paddy Field Using a Modified Fugacity Sampler

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 49, Issue 1, Pages 284-291

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es5040766

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41161160561, 21307133, 41125014, 41173082, 41322008]
  2. Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong SAR Government [N_PolyU556/11]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rice, one of the most widely cultivated crops, has received great attention in contaminant uptake from soil and air, especially for the special approaches used for its cultivation. The dry-wet alternation method can influence the air-soil partitioning of semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs) in the paddy ecosystem. Here, we modified a fugacity sampler to investigate the air-surface in situ partitioning of ubiquitous polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) at different growth stages in a suburban paddy field in South China. The canopy of rice can form a closed space, which acts like a chamber that can force the air under the canopy to equilibrate with the field surface. When we compared the fugacities calculated using a fugacity model of the partition coefficients to the measured fugacities, we observed similar trends in the variation, but significantly different values between different growing stages, especially during the flooding stages. However, the measured and calculated fugacity fractions were comparable when uncertainties in our calculations were considered, with the exception of the high molecular weight (HMW) PAHs. The measured fugacity fractions suggested that the HMW PAHs were also closed to equilibrium between the paddy field and atmosphere. The modified fugacity sampler provided a novel way of accurately determining the in situ air-soil partitioning of SVOCs in a wet paddy field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available