4.8 Article

Role of Nanoparticles in Controlling Arsenic Mobilization from Sediments near a Realgar Tailing

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 48, Issue 13, Pages 7469-7476

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es4055077

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2013CB733505]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41271260, 41276101, 41071302, 41301346]
  3. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-12-0326]
  4. Development and Reform Commission of Fujian Province, China [2011-1598]
  5. Science and Technology Program of Xiamen of Fujian Province, China [3502Z20126005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microcosm experiments were conducted to investigate the mechanism of microbial-mediated As mobilization from high arsenic tailing sediments amended with nanoparticles (NPs). The addition of SiO2 NPs could substantially stimulate arsenic mobilization in the sodium acetate amendment sediments. However, the addition of Fe2O3 and Fe3O4 NPs restrained arsenic release because these NPs resulted in Fe-As coprecipiate. Moreover, NP additions in sediments amended with sodium acetate as the electron donor clearly promoted microbial dissimilatory iron reduction. Nearly 4 times the Fe(II) (11.67-12.87 mg.L-1) from sediments amended with NPs and sodium acetate was released compared to sediments amended with only sodium acetate (3.49 mg.L-1). Based on molecular fingerprinting and sequencing analyses, the NP additions could potentially change the sediment bacterial community composition and increase the abundance of Fe(III) and As(V) reduction bacteria. Several potential NP-stimulated bacteria were related to Geobacter, Anaeromyxobacter, Clostridium, and Alicyclobacillus. The findings offer a relatively comprehensive assessment of NP (e.g., Fe2O3, Fe3O4, and SiO2) effects on sediment bacterial communities and As mobilization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available