4.8 Article

Measuring Free, Conjugated, and Halogenated Estrogens in Secondary Treated Wastewater Effluent

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 48, Issue 5, Pages 2569-2578

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es402809u

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ocean Ventures Fund and Coastal Ocean Institute at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
  2. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Sea Grant [NA10OAR4170086]
  3. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency STAR graduate fellowship [FP-91713401]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Steroidal estrogens are potent endocrine-disrupting chemicals that enter natural waters through the discharge of treated and raw sewage. Because estrogens are detrimental to aquatic organisms at sub-nanogram per liter concentrations, many studies have measured so-called free estrogen concentrations in wastewater effluents, rivers, and lakes. Other forms of estrogens are also of potential concern because conjugated estrogens can be easily converted to potent free estrogens by bacteria in wastewater treatment plants and receiving waters and halogenated estrogens are likely produced during wastewater disinfection. However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have concurrently characterized free, conjugated, and halogenated estrogens. We have developed a method that is capable of simultaneously quantifying free, conjugated, and halogenated estrogens in treated wastewater effluent, in which detection limits were 0.13-1.3 ng L-1 (free), 0.11-1.0 ng L-1 (conjugated), and 0.18-18 ng L-1 (halogenated). An aqueous phase additive, ammonium fluoride, was used to increase the electrospray (negative mode) ionization efficiency of free and halogenated estrogens by factors of 20 and 2.6, respectively. The method was validated using treated effluent from the greater Boston metropolitan area, where conjugated and halogenated estrogens made up 60-70% of the steroidal estrogen load on a molar basis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available