4.8 Article

A New High-Resolution N2O Emission Inventory for China in 2008

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 48, Issue 15, Pages 8538-8547

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es5018027

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41201077]
  2. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20120001120129]
  3. 111 Project [B14001]
  4. China Scholarship Council Program [201308110277]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The amount and geographic distribution of N2O emissions over China remain largely uncertain. In this study, county-level and 0.1 degrees x 0.1 degrees gridded anthropogenic N2O emission inventories for China (PKU-N2O) in 2008 are developed based on high-resolution activity data and regional emission factors (EFs) and parameters. These new estimates are compared with previous inventories, and with two sensitivity tests: one that uses high-resolution activity data but the default IPCC methodology (S1) and the other that uses regional EFs and parameters but starts from coarser-resolution activity data. The total N2O emissions are 2150 GgN(2)O/yr (interquartile range from 1174 to 2787 GgN(2)O/yr). Agriculture contributes 64% of the total, followed by energy (17%), indirect emissions (12%), wastes (5%), industry (2.896), and wildfires (0.2%). Our national emission total is 17% greater than that of the EDGAR v4.2 global product sampled over China and is also greater than the GAINS-China, NDRC, and SI estimates by 10%, 50%, and 17%, respectively. We also found that using uniform EFs and parameters or starting from national/provincial data spatial biases compared to PKU-N2O. Spatial analysis shows nonlinear relationships between N2O emission intensities and urbanization. Per-capita and per-GDP N2O emissions increase gradually with an increase in the urban population fraction from 0.3 to 0.9 among 2884 counties, and N2O emission density increases with urban expansion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available