4.8 Article

Microplastic Ingestion by Zooplankton

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 47, Issue 12, Pages 6646-6655

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es400663f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NERC PhD studentship [I528034]
  2. EPSRC [EP/K502339/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. NERC [pml010005] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K502339/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Natural Environment Research Council [1185064, pml010005] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Small plastic detritus, termed microplastics, are a widespread and ubiquitous contaminant of marine ecosystems across the globe. Ingestion of microplastics by marine biota, including mussels, worms, fish, and seabirds, has been widely reported, but despite their vital ecological role in marine food-webs, the impact of microplastics on zooplankton remains under-researched. Here, we show that microplastics are ingested by, and may impact upon, zooplankton. We used bioimaging techniques to document ingestion, egestion, and adherence of microplastics in a range of zooplankton common to the northeast Atlantic, and employed feeding rate studies to determine the impact of plastic detritus on algal ingestion rates in copepods. Using fluorescence and coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (CARS) microscopy we identified that thirteen zooplankton taxa had the capacity to ingest 1.7-30.6 mu m polystyrene beads, with uptake varying by taxa, life-stage and bead-size. Post-ingestion, copepods egested faecal pellets laden with microplastics. We further observed microplastics adhered to the external carapace and appendages of exposed zooplankton. Exposure of the copepod Centropages typicus to natural assemblages of algae with and without microplastics showed that 7.3 mu m microplastics (>4000 mL(-1)) significantly decreased algal feeding. Our findings imply that marine microplastic debris can negatively impact upon zooplankton function and health.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available