4.8 Article

Ruthenium Nanoparticles Supported on CeO2 for Catalytic Permanganate Oxidation of Butylparaben

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 47, Issue 22, Pages 13011-13019

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es402118v

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Shanghai Rising-Star Program [12QA1403500]
  2. Foundation of the State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, China [PCRRY11001]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21077029]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed a heterogeneous catalytic permanganate oxidation system with ceria supported ruthenium, Ru/CeO2 (0.8 parts per thousand as Ru), as catalyst for the first time. The catalytic performance of Ru/CeO2 toward butylparaben (BP) oxidation by permanganate was strongly dependent on its dosage, pH, permanganate concentration and temperature. The presence of 1.0 g L-1 Ru/CeO2 increased the oxidation rate of BP by permanganate at pH 4.0-8.0 by 3-96 times. The increase in Ru/CeO2 dosage led to a progressive enhancement in the oxidation rate of BP by permanganate at neutral pH. The XANES analysis revealed that (1) Ru was deposited on the surface of CeO2 as Ru-III; (2) Ru-III was oxidized by permanganate to its higher oxidation state Ru-VI and Ru-VII, which acted as the co-oxidants in BP oxidation; (3) Ru-VI and Ru-VII were reduced by BP to its initial state of Ru-III. Therefore, Ru/CeO2 acted as an electron shuttle in catalytic permanganate oxidation process. LC-MS/MS analysis implied that BP was initially attacked by permanganate or Ru-VI and Ru-VII at the aromatic ring, leading to the formation of various hydroxyl-substituted and ring-opening products. Ru/CeO2 could maintain its catalytic activity during the six successive runs. In conclusion, catalyzing permanganate oxidation with Ru/CeO2 is a promising technology for degrading phenolic pollutants in water treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available