4.8 Article

Autonomous Application of Quantitative PCR in the Deep Sea: In Situ Surveys of Aerobic Methanotrophs Using the Deep-Sea Environmental Sample Processor

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 47, Issue 16, Pages 9339-9346

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es4023199

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. David and Lucile Packard Foundation through Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute (MBARI)
  2. NSF [OCE-0314222, EF-0424599]
  3. NASA Astrobiology [NNG06GB34G, NNX09AB78G]
  4. Keck Foundation
  5. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation [ERG731]
  6. NASA [120409, NNX09AB78G] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent advances in ocean observing systems and genomic technologies have led to the development of the deep-sea environmental sample processor (D-ESP). The DESP filters particulates from seawater at depths up to 4000 m and applies a variety of molecular assays to the particulates, including quantitative PCR (qPCR), to identify particular organisms and genes in situ. Preserved samples enable laboratory-based validation of in situ results and expanded studies of genomic diversity and gene expression. Tests of the D-ESP at a methane-rich mound in the Santa Monica Basin centered on detection of 16S rRNA and particulate methane monooxygenase (pmoA) genes for two putative aerobic methanotrophs. Comparison of in situ qPCR results with laboratory-based assays of preserved samples demonstrates the D-ESP generated high-quality qPCR data while operating autonomously on the seafloor. Levels of 16S rRNA and pmoA cDNA detected in preserved samples are consistent with an active community of aerobic methanotrophs near the methane-rich mound. These findings are substantiated at low methane sites off Point Conception and in Monterey Bay where target genes are at or below detection limits. Successful deployment of the D-ESP is a major step toward developing autonomous systems to facilitate a wide range of marine microbiological investigations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available