4.8 Article

Hydrophilic Nanofibers as New Supports for Thin Film Composite Membranes for Engineered Osmosis

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 47, Issue 3, Pages 1761-1769

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es304215g

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (CBET), Oasys Water [1067564]
  2. Department of Energy
  3. Environmental Protection Agency STAR Program
  4. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  5. Directorate For Engineering [1067564] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Engineered osmosis (e.g., forward osmosis, pressure-retarded osmosis, direct osmosis) has emerged as a new platform for applications to water production, sustainable energy, and resource recovery. The lack of an adequately designed membrane has been the major challenge that hinders engineered osmosis (EO) development. In this study, nanotechnology has been integrated with membrane science to build a next generation membrane for engineered osmosis. Specifically, hydrophilic nanofiber, fabricated from different blends of polyacrylonitrile and cellulose acetate via electro-spinning, was found to be an effective support for EO thin film composite membranes due to its intrinsically wetted open pore structure with superior interconnectivity. The resulting composite membrane exhibits excellent permselectivity while also showing a reduced resistance to mass transfer that commonly impacts EO processes due to its thin, highly porous nanofiber support layer. Our best membrane exhibited a two to three times enhanced water flux and 90% reduction in salt passage when compared to a standard commercial FO membrane. Furthermore, our membrane exhibited one of the lowest structural parameters reported in the open literature. These results indicate that hydrophilic nanofiber supported thin film composite membranes have the potential to be a next generation membrane for engineered osmosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available