4.8 Article

Potential Environmental and Human Health Impacts of Rechargeable Lithium Batteries in Electronic Waste

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 47, Issue 10, Pages 5495-5503

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es400614y

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF's Biocomplexity in the Environment, Materials Use: Science, Engineering, and Society (MUSES) Program [DMII 0223894]
  2. UC Systemwide Research and Education in Green Materials [UC 44157]
  3. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health [UL1 TR000153]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rechargeable lithium-ion (Li-ion) and lithium-polymer (Li-poly) batteries have recently become dominant in consumer electronic products because of advantages associated with energy density and product longevity. However, the small size of these batteries, the high rate of disposal of consumer products in which they are used, and the lack of uniform regulatory policy on their disposal means that lithium batteries may contribute substantially to environmental pollution and adverse human health impacts due to potentially. toxic materials. In this research, we used standardized leaching. tests, life-cycle impact assessment (LCIA), and hazard assessment models to evaluate, hazardous waste classification, resource depletion potential, and toxicity potentials, of lithium batteries used in cellphones. Our results demonstrate that according to U.S. federal regulations, defunct Li-ion batteries are classified hazardous due to their lead(Pb): content (average 6.291 mg/L; sigma = 11.1; limit 5). However, according to California regulations, all lithium batteries tested are classified hazardous due to excessive levels of cobalt (average 163 544 mg/kg; sigma = 62 897; limit 8000), Copper (average 98 694 mg/kg; sigma = 28 7,34;,limit 2500), and nickel:. (average 9525 mg/kg; sigma = 11 438; limit 2000). In some of the Li-ion batteries, the leached concentrations of chromium, lead, and thallium exceeded the California regulation. limits. The environmental. impact associated, with resource. depletion and human. toxicity is mainly associated with cobalt, copper, nickel, thallium, and silver, whereas the ecotoxicity potential is primarily associated with cobalt, copper, nickel, thallium, and silver. However, the relative contribution of aluminum and lithium to human toxicity and ecotoxicity could not be estimated due to insufficient toxicity data in the models. These findings Support the need for stronger government policy at the local, national, and international levels to encourage recovery, recycling, and reuse of lithium. battery materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available