4.8 Article

Silica Decorated TiO2 for Virus Inactivation in Drinking Water - Simple Synthesis Method and Mechanisms of Enhanced Inactivation Kinetics

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 47, Issue 12, Pages 6463-6470

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es400196p

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US Navy [N61331-08-G0001]
  2. Center for Biological and Environmental Nanotechnology at Rice University (NSF) [EEC-0647452]
  3. Robert A. Welch Foundation
  4. University of Wales through the Prince of Wales Visiting Innovator Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new method of modifying TiO2 photocatalysts with SiO2 is developed in which SiO2 nanoparticles are simply mixed with TiO2 in water under ambient conditions. This method does not require the use of toxic solvents or significant energy input. Although the SiO2 modification slightly reduces hydroxyl free radical production, the composite SO2-TiO2 nanomaterials have markedly higher photocatalytic inactivation rates for a common surrogate virus, bacteriophage MS2 (up to 270% compared to the unmodified TiO2), due to the greatly improved adsorptive density and dark inactivation of MS2. The Langmuir isotherm describes the adsorption data well and shows that the TiO2 modified with 5% SiO2 has a maximum adsorption density q(max) 37 times that of the unmodified TiO2. The Langmuir-Hinshelwood model fits the photocatalytic inactivation kinetic data well. The SiO2-TiO2 material produces a greater maximum initial inactivation rate yet a lower intrinsic surface reaction rate constant, consistent with the reduced hydroxyl radical production and enhanced adsorption. These results suggest that modifying photocatalyst surface to increase contaminant adsorption is an important strategy to improve photocatalytic reaction, efficiency. Simple and cheap synthesis methods such as that used in this study bring photocatalysis closer to being a viable water treatment option.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available