4.8 Article

Evaluation of Uncertainties Associated with the Determination of Community Drug Use through the Measurement of Sewage Drug Biomarkers

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 47, Issue 3, Pages 1452-1460

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es302722f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Research Council of Norway [185523/V50]
  2. Dublin City University
  3. European Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA)
  4. Research Foundation Flanders (FWO)
  5. Dutch Water companies
  6. Fondazione Cariplo [2009-3468-2009.3513]
  7. Dipartimento Politiche Antidroga
  8. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [CSD2009-00065, CTQ2010-18927]
  9. Ministry and the European Regional Development Funds (ERDF) [CTQ2010-16448]
  10. Generalitat Valenciana [Prometeo 2009/054]
  11. Ledningsgruppen for Abo Akademis allmanna miljoprofilering
  12. University of Huddersfield
  13. GAJU [047/2010/Z]
  14. Ramon y Cajal, the Spanish Ministry of Education (FPU IGM)
  15. CENAKVA [CZ.1.05/2.1.00/01.0024]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to integrally address the uncertainty associated with all the steps used to estimate community drug consumption through the chemical analysis of sewage biomarkers of illicit drugs. Uncertainty has been evaluated for sampling, chemical analysis, stability of drug biomarkers in sewage, back-calculation of drug use (specific case of cocaine), and estimation of population size in a catchment using data collected from a recent Europe-wide investigation and from the available literature. The quality of sampling protocols and analytical measurements has been evaluated by analyzing standardized questionnaires collected from 19 sewage treatments plants (STPs) and the results of an interlaboratory study (ILS), respectively. Extensive reviews of the available literature have been used to evaluate stability of drug biomarkers in sewage and the uncertainty related to back-calculation of cocaine use. Different methods for estimating population size in a catchment have been compared and the variability among the collected data was very high (7-55%). A reasonable strategy to reduce uncertainty was therefore to choose the most reliable estimation case by case. In the other cases, the highest uncertainties are related to the analysis of sewage drug biomarkers (uncertainty as relative standard deviation; RSD: 6-26% from ILS) and to the back-calculation of cocaine use (uncertainty; RSD: 26%). Uncertainty can be kept below 10% in the remaining steps, if specific requirements outlined in this work are considered. For each step, a best practice protocol has been suggested and discussed to reduce and keep to a minimum the uncertainty of the entire procedure and to improve the reliability of the estimates of drug use.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available