4.8 Article

Oxygen-Reducing Biocathodes Operating with Passive Oxygen Transfer in Microbial Fuel Cells

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 47, Issue 4, Pages 2085-2091

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es3027659

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) [KUS-I1-003-13]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) [2011AA060907]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Oxygen-reducing biocathodes previously developed for microbial fuel cells (MFCs) have required energy-intensive aeration of the catholyte. To avoid the need for aeration, the ability of biocathodes to function with passive oxygen transfer was examined here using air cathode MFCs. Two-chamber, air cathode MFCs with biocathodes produced a maximum power density of 554 +/- 0 mW/m(2), which was comparable to that obtained with a Pt cathode (576 +/- 16 mW/m(2)), and 38 times higher than that produced without a catalyst (14 +/- 3 mW/m(2)). The maximum current density with biocathodes in this air-cathode MFC was 1.0 A/m(2), compared to 0.49 A/m(2) originally produced in a two-chamber MFC with an aqueous cathode (with cathode chamber aeration). Single-chamber, air-cathode MFCs with the same biocathodes initially produced higher voltages than those with Pt cathodes, but after several cycles the catalytic activity of the biocathodes was lost. This change in cathode performance resulted from direct exposure of the cathodes to solutions containing high concentrations of organic matter in the single-chamber configuration. Biocathode performance was not impaired in two-chamber designs where the cathode was kept separated from the anode solution. These results demonstrate that direct-air biocathodes can work very well, but only under conditions that minimize heterotrophic growth of microorganisms on the cathodes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available