4.8 Article

Fast and Slow Rates of Naphthalene Sorption to Biochars Produced at Different Temperatures

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 46, Issue 20, Pages 11104-11111

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es302345e

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41071210, 21277120]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [R5100105]
  3. Foundation for the Author of National Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of China [200765]
  4. National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan [D101-33B01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the sorption kinetics of a model solute (naphthalene) with a series of biochars prepared from a pine wood at 150-700 degrees C (referred as PW100-PW700) to probe the effect of the degree of carbonization of a biochar. The samples were characterized by the elemental compositions, thermal gravimetric analyses, Fourier transform IR spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, Brunauer-Emmett-Teller-N-2 surface areas (SA), and pore size distributions. Naphthalene exhibited a fast rate of sorption to PW150 owning a high oxygen content and a small SA, due supposedly to the solute partition into a swollen well-hydrated uncarbonized organic matter of PW150. The partial removal of polar-group contents in PW250/PW350, which increased the compactness of the partition medium, decreased the diffusion of the solute into the partition phase to result in a slow sorption rate. With PW500 and PW700 displaying low oxygen contents and high SA, the solute sorption rates were fast, attributed to the near exhaustion of a partition phase in the sample and to the fast solute adsorption on the carbonized biochar component. The results illustrate that the sorption rate of a solute with biochars is controlled largely by the solute's diffusivity in the biochar's partition phase, in which the medium compactness affects directly the solute diffusivity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available