4.8 Article

Removal of Trace Organic Micropollutants by Drinking Water Biological Filters

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 46, Issue 17, Pages 9412-9419

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es301428e

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Water Research Institute Fellowship
  2. Malcolm Pirnie, Inc. Fellowship
  3. EPA Science To Achieve Results (STAR) Fellowship [9173000]
  4. Solano County Water Agency
  5. California Department of Water Resources
  6. California Department of Public Health through the state of California Proposition 50
  7. MWH, Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The long-term removal of 34 trace organic micropollutants (<1 mu g L-1) was evaluated and modeled in drinking water biological filters with sand media from a full-scale plant. The micropollutants included pesticides, pharmaceuticals, and personal care products, some of which are endocrine disrupting chemicals, and represent a wide range of uses, chemical structures, adsorbabilities, and biodegradabilities. Micropollutant removal ranged from no measurable removal (<15%) for 13 compounds to removal below the detection limit and followed one of four trends over the one year study period: steady state removal throughout, increasing removal to steady state (acclimation), decreasing removal, or no removal (recalcitrant). Removals for all 19 nonrecalcitrant compounds followed first-order kinetics when at steady state with increased removal at longer empty bed contact times (EBCT). Rate constants were calculated, 0.02-0.37 min(-1), and used in a pseudo-first-order rate model with the EBCT to predict removals in laboratory biofilters at a different EBCT and influent conditions. Drinking water biofiltration has the potential to be an effective process for the control of many trace organic contaminants and a pseudo-first-order model can serve as an appropriate method for approximating performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available