4.8 Article

CO2 Capture in Alkanolamine-RTIL Blends via Carbamate Crystallization: Route to Efficient Regeneration

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 46, Issue 20, Pages 11443-11450

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es302513j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC)
  2. FL Canada Research Chair

Ask authors/readers for more resources

One of the major drawbacks of aqueous alkanolamine based CO2 capture processes is the requirement of significantly higher energy of regeneration. This weakness can be overcome by separating the CO2-captured product to regenerate the corresponding amine, thus avoiding the consumption of redundant energy. Replacing aqueous phase with more stable and practically nonvolatile imidazolium based room-temperature ionic liquid (RTIL) provided a viable approach for carbamate to crystallize out as supernatant solid. In the present study, regeneration capabilities of solid carbamates have been investigated. Diethanolamine (DEA) carbamate as well as 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP) carbarnate were obtained in crystalline form by bubbling CO2 in alkanolamine-RTIL mixtures. Hydrophobic RTIL, 1-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium bis-(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide ([hmim][Tf2N]), was used as aqueous phase substituent. Thermal behavior of the carbamates was observed by differential scanning calorimetry and thermogravimetric analysis, while the possible regeneration mechanism has been proposed through C-13 NMR and FTIR analyses. The results showed that decomposition of DEA-carbamate commenced at lower temperature (similar to 55 degrees C), compared to that of AMP-carbamate (similar to 75 degrees C); thus promising easy regeneration. The separation of carbamate as solid phase can offer two-way advantage by letting less volume to regenerate as well as by narrowing the gap between CO2 capture and amine regeneration temperatures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available