4.8 Article

Physical Disintegration of Toilet Papers in Wastewater Systems: Experimental Analysis and Mathematical Modeling

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 46, Issue 5, Pages 2870-2876

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es203589v

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Sakarya University Scientific Research Foundation [2007-01-12-002]
  2. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Physical disintegration of representative toilet papers was investigated in this study to assess their disintegration potential in sewer systems. Characterization of toilet papers from different parts of the world indicated two main categories as premium and average quality. Physical disintegration experiments were conducted with representative products from each category according to standard protocols with improvements. The experimental results were simulated by mathematical model to estimate best-fit values of disintegration rate coefficients and fractional distribution ratios. Our results from mathematical modeling and experimental work show that premium products release more amounts of small fibers and disintegrate more slowly than average ones. Comparison of the toilet papers with the tampon applicators studied previously indicates that premium quality toilet papers present significant potential to persist in sewer pipes. Comparison of turbulence level in our experimental setup with those of partial flow conditions in sewer pipes indicates that drains and small sewer pipes are critical sections where disintegration of toilet papers will be limited. For improvement, requirements for minimum pipe slopes may be increased to sustain transport and disintegration of flushable products in small pipes. In parallel, toilet papers can be improved to disintegrate rapidly in sewer systems, while they meet consumer expectations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available