4.8 Article

Public Participation in Soil Surveys: Lessons from a Pilot Study in England

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 46, Issue 7, Pages 3687-3696

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es203880p

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
  2. Big Lottery Fund
  3. Natural Environment Research Council [bgs05008] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. NERC [bgs05008] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In many countries there are policies in place that impact on soils, but very few legislative or policy tools specifically for the protection of soil. Recent EU legislative proposals on soil protection have been met with opposition on the grounds of excessive cost and resource demands. With the need for evidence based policy, and recognition that involving the public in environmental monitoring is an effective way of increasing understanding and commitment, there has been growing interest in soil surveys. In addition, it is accepted that the success of environmental policies depends greatly on how effectively scientists, regulators, stakeholders, and society communicate. This paper presents the Open Air Laboratories (OPAL) Soil and Earthworm Survey as an example of public participation in soil surveys that aims to integrate the above. It is demonstrated how such surveys generate data that can be used to prioritise soil assessment, in order to address some of the concerns and objections to soil protection policies. Lessons from this pilot study in England highlight that with strategic planning of civic participation activities, this approach can deliver improvements in the quality of the evidence collected and allow for effective public involvement in policymaking and implementation, on top of direct educational benefits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available