4.8 Article

Speciation of Arsenic, Chromium, and Vanadium in Red Mud Samples from the Ajka Spill Site, Hungary

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 46, Issue 6, Pages 3085-3092

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es3003475

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. UK Natural Environment Research Council [NE/1019468/1]
  2. [SP7058]
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/E059678/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/I019468/1, NE/H005749/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. EPSRC [EP/E059678/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. NERC [NE/H005749/1, NE/I019468/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Results are presented from X-ray absorption spectroscopy based analysis of As, Cr, and V speciation within samples of bauxite ore processing residue (red mud) collected from the spill site at Ajka, Western Hungary. Cr Kedge XANES analysis found that Cr is present as Cr3+ substituted into hematite, consistent with TEM analysis. V K-edge XANES spectra have E-1/2 position and pre-edge features consistent with the presence of V5+ species, possibly associated with Ca-aluminosilicate phases. As K-edge XANES spectra identified As present as As5+. EXAFS analysis reveals arsenate phases in red mud samples. When alkaline leachate from the spill site is neutralized with HCl, 94% As and 71% V are removed from solution during the formation of amorphous Al-oxyhydroxide. EXAFS analysis of As in this precipitate reveals the presence of arsenate Al-oxyhydroxide surface complexes. These results suggest that in the circumneutral pH, oxic conditions found in the Torna and Upper Marcal catchments, incorporation and sorption, respectively, will restrict the environmental mobility of Cr and As. V is inefficiently removed from solution by neutralization, therefore, the red mud may act as a source of mobile V5+ where the red mud deposits are not removed from affected land.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available