4.3 Article

Fiber Supplementation Lowers Plasma p-Cresol in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients

Journal

JOURNAL OF RENAL NUTRITION
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages 316-320

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.jrn.2014.09.002

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Saskatchewan Pulse Crop Development Board [PRO09019]
  2. NIH [UL1 TR000064]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To determine the effects of supplemental fiber on plasma p-cresol, stool frequency, and quality of life (QoL) in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Design and Setting: In a 12-week single-blind study, participants were provided with control muffins and supplements (5.5 g sucrose/day) for 2 weeks, muffins containing 10 g/day pea hull fiber and control supplements for 4 weeks, and muffins with 10 g/day pea hull fiber and 15 g/day inulin as a supplement for 6 weeks. Subjects: Individuals with CKD (n = 13; 6 males, 7 females; aged 65 +/- 3 years; estimated glomerular filtration rate <50 mL/minute/1.73(2)) completed the study. Main Outcome Measures: Plasma p-cresol was determined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, stool frequency by 5-day journals, and QoL by the KDQOL-36 (TM). Results: Plasma p-cresol decreased from 7.25 +/- 1.74 mg/L during week 1 to 5.82 +/- 1.72 mg/L during week 12 (P<.05), and in participants with high compliance (>70% inulin intake), from 6.71 +/- 1.98 mg/L to 4.22 +/- 1.16 mg/L (P<.05). Total fiber intake increased from 16.6 +/- 1.7 g/day during control to 26.5 +/- 2.4 g/day (P<.0001) with the added pea hull and to 34.5 +/- 2.2 g/day with pea hull and inulin (P<.0001). Stool frequency increased from 1.4 +/- 0.2 stools/day during control to 1.9 +/- 0.3 stools/day during both fiber periods (P<.05). No change in overall QoL was observed. Conclusions: Supplementing the diet of CKD patients with fiber may be a dietary therapy to reduce p-cresol and improve stool frequency. (C) 2015 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available