4.8 Article

Net Degradation of Methyl Mercury in Alder Swamps

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 46, Issue 24, Pages 13144-13151

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es303543k

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning (Formas) [214-2005-1462, 229-2009-1207]
  2. Oscar & Lili Lamm foundation
  3. Centre for Environmental Research (CMF) [0822333]
  4. Kempe foundations

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Wetlands are generally considered to be sources of methyl mercury (MeHg) in northern temperate landscapes. However, a recent input-output mass balance study during 2007-2010 revealed a black alder Ohms glutinosa) swamp in southern Sweden to be a consistent and significant MeHg sink, with a 30-60% loss of MeHg. The soil pool of MeHg varied substantially between years, but it always decreased with distance from the stream inlet to the swamp. The soil MeHg pool was significantly lower in the downstream as compared to the upstream half of the swamp (0.66 and 1.34 ng MeHg g(-1) SOC-1 annual average(-1), respectively, one-way ANOVA, p = 0.0006). In 2008 a significant decrease of %MeHg in soil was paralleled by a significant increase in potential demethylation rate constant (k(d), p < 0.02 and p < 0.004, respectively). In contrast, the potential methylation rate constant (k(m)) was unrelated to distance (p = 0.3). Our results suggest that MeHg was net degraded in the Alnus swamp, and that it had a rapid and dynamic internal turnover of MeHg. Snapshot stream input-output measurements at eight additional Alnus glutinosa swamps in southern Sweden indicate that Alnus swamps in general are sinks for MeHg. findings have implications forestry practices and landscape planning, and suggest that restored or preserved Alnus swamps may be used to mitigate MeHg produced in northern temperate landscapes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available