4.8 Article

Character and Chlorine Reactivity of Dissolved Organic Matter from a Mountain Pine Beetle Impacted Watershed

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 45, Issue 13, Pages 5717-5724

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es1042436

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Water Research Foundation [4282]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lodgepole pine needle leachates from trees killed by the mountain pine beetle epidemic in Colorado were evaluated for dissolved organic matter (DOM) character, biodegradation, treatability by coagulation and disinfection byproduct (DBP) formation. An average of 8.0 (+/- 0.62) mg-DOC/g-dry weight of litter was leached from three sets of needle samples representing different levels of forest floor degradation. Fluorescence analysis included collection of excitation and emission matrices, examination of peak intensities and development of a 4-component parallel factor (PARAFAC) analysis model. Peak intensity and PARAFAC analyses provided complementary results showing that fresh leachates were initially dominated by polyphenolic/protein-like components (60-70%) and humic-like fluorescence increased (40-70%) after biodegradation. Humic-like components were removed by coagulation (20-64%), while polyphenolic/protein-like components were not, which may create challenges for utilities required to meet OM removal regulations. DBP formation yields after 24 h chlorination were 20.5-26.4 mu g/mg-DOC for trihalomethanes and 9.0-14.5 mu g/mg-DOC for haloacetic acids for fresh leachates; increased after biodegradation to 19.2-64.2 and 7.1-30.9 mu g/mg-DOC, respectively; and decreased after coagulation (fresh: 11.3-17.7;5.7-7.6 mu g/mg-DOC, respectively; biodegraded: 12.0-27.3 and 2.9-7.2 mu g/mg-DOC, respectively), reflective of changes in concentration of humic material. Humic-like PARAFAC components and peak intensities were positively correlated (R(2) >= 0.45) to DBP concentrations, while polyphenolic/protein-like components were not (R(2) <= 0.17).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available