4.8 Article

Behavior of Metallic Silver Nanoparticles in a Pilot Wastewater Treatment Plant

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 45, Issue 9, Pages 3902-3908

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es1041892

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Electron Microscopy Centers at ETH Zurich (EMEZ, Zurich, Switzerland)
  2. Empa (Swiss Federal Institute for Materials Science and Technology, Duebendorf, Switzerland)
  3. Swiss Federal Office for the Environment (BAFU)
  4. Office for Waste, Water, Energy and Air (AWEL)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated the behavior of metallic silver nanoparticles (Ag-NP) in a pilot wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) fed with municipal wastewater. The treatment plant consisted of a nonaerated and an aerated tank and a secondary clarifier. The average hydraulic retention time including the secondary clarifier was 1 day and the sludge age was 14 days. Ag-NP were spiked into the nonaerated tank and samples were collected from the aerated tank and from the effluent. Ag concentrations determined by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) were in good agreement with predictions based on mass balance considerations. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analyses confirmed that nanoscale Ag panicles were sorbed to wastewater biosolids, both in the sludge and in the effluent. Freely dispersed nanoscale Ag particles were only observed in the effluent during the initial pulse spike. X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) measurements indicated that most Ag in the sludge and in the effluent was present as Ag2S. Results from batch experiments suggested that Ag-NP transformation to Ag2S occured in the nonaerated tank within less than 2 h. Physical and chemical transformations of Ag-NP in WWTPs control the fate, the transport and also the toxicity and the bioavailability of Ag-NP and therefore must be considered in future risk assessments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available