4.8 Article

Ecologically Informed Engineering Reduces Loss of Intertidal Biodiversity on Artificial Shorelines

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 45, Issue 19, Pages 8204-8207

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es201924b

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. North Sydney Council
  2. Woollahra Municipal Council
  3. City of Sydney
  4. The Centre for Research on Ecological Impacts of Coastal Cities (University of Sydney)
  5. ECS Services
  6. Antique Stone

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Worldwide responses to urbanization, expanding populations and climatic change mean biodiverse habitats are replaced with expensive, but necessary infrastructure. Coastal cities support vast expanses of buildings and roads along the coast or on reclaimed land, leading to armouring of shorelines with walls, revetments and offshore structures to reduce erosion and flooding. Currently infrastructure is designed to meet engineering and financial criteria, without considering its value as habitat, despite artificial shorelines causing loss of intertidal species and altering ecological natural processes that sustain natural biodiversity. Most research on ameliorating these impacts focus on soft-sediment habitats and larger flora (e.g., restoring marshes, encouraging plants to grow on walls). In response to needs for greater collaboration between ecologists and engineers to create infrastructure to better support biodiversity, we show how such collaborations lead to small-scale and inexpensive ecologically informed engineering which reduces loss of species of algae and animals from rocky shores replaced by walls. Adding experimental novel habitats to walls mimicking rock-pools (e.g., cavities, attaching flowerpots) increased numbers of species by 110% within months, in particular mobile animals most affected by replacing natural shores with walls. These advances provide new insights about melding engineering and ecological knowledge to sustain biodiversity in cities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available