4.8 Article

Regional Characterization of Freshwater Use in LCA: Modeling Direct Impacts on Human Health

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 45, Issue 20, Pages 8948-8957

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es1030883

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Universite de Montreal
  2. International Chair in Life Cycle Assessment (a research unit of CIRAIG)
  3. Alcan
  4. ArcelorMittal
  5. Bell Canada
  6. Cascades
  7. Eco Entreprises Quebec
  8. RECYC-QUEBEC
  9. Groupe EDF/GDF-SUEZ
  10. Hydro-Quebec
  11. Johnson Johnson
  12. Mouvement des caisses Desjardins
  13. RONA
  14. Total
  15. Veolia Environnement

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a methodology that quantifies potential environmental impacts for comparative purposes in a decision-making context. While potential environmental impacts from pollutant emissions into water are characterized in LCA, impacts from water unavailability are not yet fully quantified. Water use can make the resource unavailable to other users by displacement or quality degradation. A reduction in water availability to human users can potentially affect human health. If financial resources are available, there can be adaptations that may, in turn, shift the environmental burdens to other life cycle stages and impact categories. This paper proposes a model to evaluate these potential impacts in an LCA context. It considers the water that is withdrawn and released, its quality and scarcity in order to evaluate the loss of functionality associated with water uses. Regionalized results are presented for impacts on human health for two modeling approaches regarding affected users, including or not domestic uses, and expressed in disability-adjusted life years (DALY). A consumption and quality based scarcity indicator is also proposed as a midpoint. An illustrative example is presented for the production of corrugated board with different effluents, demonstrating the importance of considering quality, process effluents and the difference between the modeling approaches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available