4.8 Article

Radiation Absorption and Optimization of Solar Photocatalytic Reactors for Environmental Applications

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 44, Issue 13, Pages 5112-5120

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es100130h

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NATO [CPB.EAP.SFPP982835]
  2. E.ON AG (EON International Research Initiative)
  3. Vice-Head Office of Research of the Universidad del Valle [2520]
  4. COLCIENCIAS [110647922029]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study provides a systematic and quantitative approach to the analysis and optimization of solar photocatalytic reactors utilized in environmental applications such as pollutant remediation and conversion of biomass (waste) to hydrogen. Ray tracing technique was coupled with the six-flux absorption scattering model (SFM) to analyze the complex radiation field in solar compound parabolic collectors (CPC) and tubular photoreactors. The absorption of solar radiation represented by the spatial distribution of the local volumetric rate of photon absorption (LVRPA) depends strongly on catalyst loading and geometry. The total radiation absorbed in the reactors, the volumetric rate of absorption (VRPA), was analyzed as a function of the optical properties (scattering albedo) of the photocatalyst The VRPA reached maxima at specific catalyst concentrations in close agreement with literature experimental studies. The CPC has on average 70% higher photon absorption efficiency than a tubular reactor and requires 39% less catalyst to operate under optimum conditions. The apparent optical thickness is proposed as a new dimensionless parameter for optimization of CPC and tubular reactors. It removes the dependence of the optimum catalyst concentration on tube diameter and photocatalyst scattering albedo. For titanium dioxide (TiO2) Degussa P25, maximum photon absorption occurs at apparent optical thicknesses of 7.78 for CPC and 12.97 for tubular reactors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available