4.8 Article

Comparative Eco-Toxicities of Nano-ZnO Particles under Aquatic and Aerosol Exposure Modes

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages 1484-1489

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es9030497

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Nano Research Facility (NRF)
  2. National Science Foundation under NSF [ECS-0335765]
  3. MAGEEP/Nanomedicine Pilot Grant at Washington University
  4. DOD-MURI [FA9550-04-1-0430]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The antimicrobial activity of ZnO nanoparticles (NPS) was investigated under aquatic and aerosol exposure modes. DO NIPS in aquatic media aggregated to micrometer-sized particles and did not interact with microorganisms effectively. Hence, the inhibition of microbial growth by nano-ZnO NIPS (e.g., Mycobacterium smegmatis and Cyanothece 51142) in aquatic media was mainly attributable to dissolved zinc species. Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 and Escherichia coli were able to produce large amounts of extracellular polymeric substances, and their growth was not inhibited by ZnO NIPS in aquatic media, even at high concentrations (>40 mg/L). On the other hand, when ZnO NIPS were electrosprayed onto an E. coli biofilm so that NIPS could be directly deposited onto the cell surface, the aerosol exposure dramatically reduced cellular viability. For example, an electrospray of ZnO NIPS (20 nm) reduced the total number of viable E.coli cells by 57% compared to the control case, in which we electrosprayed only the buffer solution. However, electrospraying large-sized ZnO particles (480 nm) or nonsoluble TiO2 NPs (20 nm) caused much less lethality to E coli cells. The above observation implies that the aerosol method of exposing ZnO NPs to biological systems appears to have a much higher antimicrobial activity, and thus may lead to practical applications of employing a novel antimicrobial agent for airborne disease control.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available