4.8 Article

Mechanisms and Specific Directionality of Autotrophic Nitrous Oxide and Nitric Oxide Generation during Transient Anoxia

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages 1313-1319

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es902794a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation
  2. Delft University of Technology
  3. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  4. Directorate For Engineering [0846650] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The overall goal of this study was to determine the molecular and metabolic responses of chemostat cultures of model nitrifying bacteria to imposition of and recovery from transient anoxic conditions. Based on the study, a specific directionality in nitrous oxide (N2O) and nitric oxide (NO) production was demonstrated. N2O production was only observed during recovery to aerobic conditions after a period of anoxia and correlated positively with the degree of ammonia accumulation during anoxia. NO, on the other hand, was emitted mainly under anoxia. The production of NO was linked to a major imbalance in the expression of the nitrite reductase gene, which was over-expressed during transient anoxia. In contrast genes coding for ammonia and hydroxylamine oxidation and nitric oxide reduction were generally under-expressed during transient anoxia. These results are different from the observed parallel expression and activity of nitrite and nitric oxide reductase in heterotrophic bacteria subjected to transient oxygen cycling. Unlike NO, the production of N2O could not be solely correlated to gene expression patterns and likely involved responses at the enzyme activity or metabolic levels. Based on experimental data, the propensity of the nitrifying cultures for N2O production is related to a shift in their metabolism from a low specific activity (q < q(max)) toward the maximum specific activity (q(max)).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available