4.8 Article

Stream Temperature Response to Three Riparian Vegetation Scenarios by Use of a Distributed Temperature Validated Model

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages 2072-2078

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es902654f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [EAR 0711594]
  2. Competence Center Environment and Sustainability of the ETH Domain (CCES) SwissEx
  3. National Center of Competence in Research: Mobile Information and Communication Systems (NCCR-MICS
  4. European Commission [224416]
  5. Division Of Earth Sciences
  6. Directorate For Geosciences [0930061] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Division Of Earth Sciences
  8. Directorate For Geosciences [0929638] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Elevated in-stream temperature has led to a surge in the occurrence of parasitic intrusion proliferative kidney disease and has resulted in fish kills throughout Switzerland's waterways. Data from distributed temperature sensing (DTS) in-stream measurements for three cloud-free days in August 2007 over a 1260 m stretch of the Boiron de Morges River in southwest Switzerland were used to calibrate and validate a physically based one-dimensional stream temperature model. Stream temperature response to three distinct riparian conditions were then modeled: open, in-stream reeds, and forest cover. Simulation predicted a mean peak stream temperature increase of 0.7 degrees C if current vegetation was removed, an increase of 0.1 degrees C if dense reeds covered the entire stream reach, and a decrease of 1.2 degrees C if a mature riparian forest covered the entire reach. Understanding that full vegetation canopy cover is the optimal riparian management option for limiting stream temperature, in-stream reeds, which require no riparian set-aside and grow very quickly, appear to provide substantial thermal control, potentially useful for land-use management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available