4.8 Article

Sulfide Remediation by Pulsed Injection of Nitrate into a Low Temperature Canadian Heavy Oil Reservoir

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 43, Issue 24, Pages 9512-9518

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es902211j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada
  2. ConocoPhillips Company
  3. Baker Hughes Incorporated
  4. NSERC Industrial Research Chair Award
  5. Baker Hughes Incorporated, Commercial Microbiology Limited (Intertek)
  6. Computer Modelling Group Limited
  7. YPF SA
  8. Aramco Services
  9. Shell Canada Limited
  10. Suncor Energy Developments Inc.
  11. Yara International ASA
  12. Alberta Energy Research Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sulfide formation by oil field sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) can be diminished by the injection of nitrate, stimulating the growth of nitrate-reducing bacteria (NRB). We monitored the field-wide injection of nitrate into a low temperature (similar to 30 degrees C) oil reservoir in western Canada by determining aqueous concentrations of sulfide, sulfate, nitrate, and nitrite, as well as the activities of NRB in water samples from 3 water plants, 2 injection wells, and 15 production wells over 2 years. The injection water had a low sulfate concentration (similar to 1 mM). Nitrate (2.4 mM, 150 ppm) was added at the water plants. Its subsequent distribution to the injection wells gave losses of 5-15% in the pipeline system, indicating that most was injected. Continuous nitrate injection lowered the total aqueous sulfide output of the production wells by 70% in the first five weeks, followed by recovery. Batchwise treatment of a limited section of the reservoir with high nitrate eliminated sulfide from one production well with nitrate breakthrough. Subsequent, field-wide treatment with week-long pulses of 14 mM nitrate gave breakthrough at an additional production well. However, this trend was reversed when injection with a constant dose of 2.4 mM (150 ppm) was resumed. The results are explained by assuming growth of SRB near the injection wellbore due to sulfate limitation. Injection of a constant nitrate dose inhibits these SRB initially. However, because of the constant, low temperature of the reservoir, SRB eventually grow back in a zone further removed from the injection wellbore. The resulting zonation (NRB closest to and SRB further away from the injection wellbore) can be broken by batch-wise increases in the concentration of injected nitrate, allowing it to re-enter the SRB-dominated zone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available