4.8 Article

Fungicide Risk Assessment for Aquatic Ecosystems: Importance of Interspecific Variation, Toxic Mode of Action, and Exposure Regime

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 43, Issue 19, Pages 7556-7563

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es901461c

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. UK Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra)
  2. Dutch Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Safety [416]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The risk assessment of fungicides in Europe uses information from ecotoxicity studies performed on vertebrates, invertebrates, and primary producers, but not nontarget fungi. But which toxicity data should be used to assess risk and how important are modes of action and exposure regimes? A data set was compiled comprising acute single-species toxicity data for 42 fungicides, semifield data for 12 fungicides, and covering seven toxic modes of action and different exposure regimes. Most fungicides were general biocides and data from all taxonomic groups were used to construct species sensitivity distributions (SSDs) and assess risk. The derived lower-limit HC5 values and HC1 values were always protective of adverse ecological effects in semifield studies and HC5 values were protective for at least 3 of the fungicides. Expanding the analysis to include insecticides and herbicides, the following threshold values, derived from SSDs based on the most sensitive taxonomic group, are proposed to protect against adverse ecological effects from pesticide exposure: (i) the HC5 can be used for short-term exposures; (ii) the HC5 divided by 1.5 can be used for medium-term exposures; (iii) either the HC1 or the HC5 divided by 3 can be used for long-term exposures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available