4.8 Article

Combining HPLC-GCXGC, GCXGC/ToF-MS, and Selected Ecotoxicity Assays for Detailed Monitoring of Petroleum Hydrocarbon Degradation in Soil and Leaching Water

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 43, Issue 20, Pages 7651-7657

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es9015603

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. VITO Doctorandus Research Project

Ask authors/readers for more resources

HPLC-GCXGC/FID (high-performance liquid chromatography followed by comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography with flame-ionization detection) and GCXGC/ToF-MS (comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography with time-of-flight mass spectrometry) were used to study the biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in soil microcosms during 20 weeks. Two soils were studied: one spiked with fresh diesel and one field sample containing weathered diesel-like oil. Nutrient amended and unamended samples were included. Total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) levels in spiked soil decreased from 15 000 to 7500 mg/kg d.m. and from 12 000 to 4000 mg/kg d.m. in the field soil, Linear alkanes and aromatic hydrocarbons were better biodegradable (>60% degraded) then iso-alkanes; cycloalkanes were least degradable (<40%). Aromatic hydrocarbons up to three rings showed better degradability than n-alkanes. GCXGC/ToF-MS analysis of leaching water showed that initially various oxygenated hydrocarbons were produced. Compound peaks seemed to move up and rightward in the GCXGC chromatograms, indicating that more polar and heavier compounds were formed as biodegradation proceeded. Nutrient amendment can increase TPH removal rates, but had adverse effects on ecotoxicity and leaching potential in our experiment This was explained by observed shifts in the soil microbial community. Ecotoxicity assays showed that residual TPH still inhibited cress (Lepidium sativum) seed germination, but the leaching water was no longer toxic toward luminescent bacteria (Vibrio fischeri).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available