4.8 Article

Characterizing the Oxygen Isotopic Composition of Phosphate Sources to Aquatic Ecosystems

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 43, Issue 14, Pages 5190-5196

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es900337q

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CALFED
  2. National Science Foundation [0354319, 0749908]
  3. CALTRANS
  4. Division Of Ocean Sciences
  5. Directorate For Geosciences [0749908] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Division Of Ocean Sciences
  7. Directorate For Geosciences [0354319] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The oxygen isotopic composition of dissolved inorganic phosphate (delta O-18(p)) in many aquatic ecosystems is not in isotopic equilibrium with ambient water and, therefore, may reflect the source delta O-18(p). Identification of phosphate sources to water bodies is critical for designing best management practices for phosphate load reduction to control eutrophication. In order for delta O-18(p) to be a useful tool for source tracking, the delta O-18(p) of phosphate sources must be distinguishable from one another; however, the delta O-18(p) of potential sources has not been well characterized. We measured the delta O-18(p) of a variety of known phosphate sources, including fertilizers, semiprocessed phosphorite ore, particulate aerosols, detergents, leachates of vegetation, soil, animal feces, and wastewater treatment plant effluent We found a considerable range of delta O-18(p) values (from +8.4 to +24.9 parts per thousand) for the various sources, and statistically significant differences were found between several of the source types. delta O-18(p) measured in three different fresh water systems was generally not in equilibrium with ambient water. Although there is overlap in delta O-18(p) values among the groups of samples, our results indicate that some sources are isotopically distinct and delta O-18(p) can be used for identifying phosphate to aquatic systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available