4.8 Article

Efficient removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution with Fe@Fe2O3 core-shell nanowires

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 42, Issue 18, Pages 6955-6960

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es800962m

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [0503009, 20673041, 20777026]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2007CB613301]
  3. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-07-0352]
  4. Key Project of Ministry of Education of China [108097]
  5. Outstanding Young Research Award of National Natural Science Foundation of China [50525619]
  6. Postdoctors Foundation of China [20070410935]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The batch removal of Cr(VI) from simulated wastewater with Fe@Fe2O3 core-shell nanowires (FCSNs) was investigated in this study. It was found that each gram of the FCSNs could remove 7.78 mg of Cr(VI) from simulated wastewater containing 8.0 mg L-1 of Cr(VI) with an initial pH of 6.5 at room temperature. The Freundlich adsorption isotherm was applicable to describe the removal processes. Kinetics of the Cr(VI) removal was found to follow pseudo-second-order rate equation. Furthermore, the as-prepared and Cr(VI)-adsorbed FCSNs were carefully examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic analysis (XPS). The characterization results suggested that the adsorbed Cr(VI) was partially reduced to Cr(III) in Cr2O3/Cr(OH)(3) on the FCSNs. The possible mechanism of removal of Cr(VI) on FCSNs was proposed, which involved the dominant Cr(VI) adsorption, followed by the partial reduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) (chromium(III) oxyhydroides) on the surface of FCSNs. These Fe@Fe2O3 core-shell nanowires with high specific surface area and strong magnetic property are very attractive for the removal of Cr(VI) from wastewater.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available