4.8 Article

Investigation of the transport and deposition of fullerene (C60) nanoparticles in quartz sands under varying flow conditions

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 42, Issue 19, Pages 7174-7180

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es801305y

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Science [RD-832535]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A coupled experimental and mathematical modeling investigation was undertaken to explore nanoscale fullerene aggregate (nC(60)) transport and deposition in water-saturated porous media. Column experiments were conducted with four different size fractions of Ottawa sand at two pore-water velocities. A mathematical model that incorporates nonequilibrium attachment kinetics and a maximum retention capacity was used to simulate experimental nC60 effluent breakthrough curves and deposition profiles. Fitted maximum retention capacities (S-max), which ranged from 0.44 to 13.99 mu g/g, are found to be correlated to normalized mass flux. The developed correlation provides a means to estimate S-max as a function of flow velocity, nanoparticle size, and mean grain size of the porous medium. Collision efficiency factors, estimated from fitted attachment rate coefficients, are relatively constant (similar to 0.14) over the range of conditions considered. These fitted values, however, are more than I order of magnitude larger than the theoretical collision efficiency factor computed from Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek (DLVO) theory (0.009). Data analyses suggest that neither physical straining nor attraction to the secondary minimum is responsible for this discrepancy. Patch-wise surface charge heterogeneity on the sand grains is shown to be the likely contributor to the observed deviations from classical DLVO theory. These findings indicate that modifications to clean-bed filtraton theory and consideration of surface heterogeneity are necessary to accurately predict nC(60) transport behavior in saturated porous media.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available