4.7 Article

REDD plus policy strategy in Cameroon: Actors, institutions and governance

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY
Volume 35, Issue -, Pages 87-97

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2013.02.004

Keywords

REDD; Policy design; Governance; Institutions; Forests; Cameroon

Funding

  1. Canada's IDRC
  2. DfID
  3. Congo Basin Forest
  4. Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation (COBAM) project within the PACEBCO programs
  5. AfDB
  6. CEEAC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+) is receiving increasing political and scientific attention as a climate change mitigation approach. The government of Cameroon has expressed an interest in participating in REDD+, and national deliberation on a policy strategy has attracted interest from different actors in the forest sector. This paper analyses the challenges of designing a governance structure for a REDD+ strategy in Cameroon. Theoretically, the paper builds on the literature on governance structures for resource management, focusing analytically on the interactions between actor constellations (state and non-state) and institutions (formal and informal) to produce policy outcomes. The paper draws on documentation of REDD+ policy events, policy texts and 23 in-depth interviews with members from government, civil society, research organizations, development partners and the private sector. It argues that although the actors involved in REDD+ are, to an extent, polarized around different issues and priorities, they are nonetheless increasingly distributing roles and responsibilities among themselves. The institutional arrangements within the policy process include: (1) rule-making systems for engagement; (2) expanding existing coordination mechanisms; (3) national safeguard standards; and (4) building on existing forest governance initiatives. The paper concludes that the multiple benefits promised by REDD+, such as poverty alleviation, biodiversity conservation and economic development, are critical for the legitimacy of the mechanism. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available