Journal
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY
Volume 22, Issue -, Pages 47-59Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.05.006
Keywords
Water Framework Directive; Water quality change; Contingent valuation; Zero responses; Spike model; Sample selection bias
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This article addresses an important topic related to the application of the European Water Framework Directive (WFD) in Spanish watersheds. Results on a contingent valuation study, aimed to assess the non-market benefits of water quality improvements in the Guadiana river basin (GRB), are shown. Special attention has been paid to the issue of zero willingness-to-pay (WTP) responses, while addressing the possible presence of self-selection caused by protest responses. The results (i) indicate that sample selection bias is not a problem in our application, (ii) allow us to identify some key determinants of voting behaviour, and (iii) through the use of different econometric models allows us to find a robust estimate for the mean WTP to accurately inform decision-making. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available