4.7 Article

Changing the retention properties of catchments and their influence on runoff under climate change

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aadd32

Keywords

runoff; water retention; climate change; atmospheric CO2; hydrological cycle; drought risk

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41530528]
  2. 111 project [B14001]
  3. National Youth Top-notch Talent Support Program in China
  4. NERC Science Budget
  5. European Research Council Synergy grant [ERC-2013-SyG-610028 IMBALANCE-P]
  6. NERC [ceh020006, NE/I006702/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/I006702/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many studies on drought consider precipitation and potential evapotranspiration (PET) impacts. However, catchment water retention is a factor affecting the interception of precipitation and slowing down runoff which also plays a critical role in determining the risks of hydrological drought. The Budyko framework links retention to the partitioning of precipitation into runoff or evapotranspiration. Applied worldwide, we demonstrate that retention changes are the dominant contribution to measured runoff changes in 21 of 33 major catchments. Similarly, assessing climate simulations for the historical period suggests that models substantially underestimate observed runoff changes due to unrepresented water management processes. Climate models show that water retention (without direct water management) generally decreases by the end of the 21st century, except in dry central Asia and northwestern China. Such decreases raise runoff, mainly driven by precipitation intensity increases (RCP4.5 scenario) and additionally by CO2-induced stomata closure (RCP8.5). This mitigates runoff deficits (generally from raised PET under warming) by increasing global mean runoff from -2.77 mm yr(-1) to +3.81 mm yr(-1) (RCP4.5), and -6.98 mm yr(-1) to +5.11 mm yr(-1) (RCP8.5).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available