4.7 Article

Variations in soil carbon dioxide efflux across a thaw slump chronosequence in northwestern Alaska

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/9/2/025001

Keywords

climate change; CO2 efflux; arctic; thaw slump; thermokarst; chronosequence; controls on CO2 efflux; soil temperature; soil moisture; bulk density; soil organic matter; thermal erosion

Funding

  1. Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL IGPP Minigrant) [166259]
  2. Selawik National Wildlife Refuge [USFWS - CESU 84320-9-J306R]
  3. NSF's Arctic System Science (ARCSS) Program [OPP - 0806399]
  4. NSF Idaho EPSCoR Program in Water Resources in a Changing Climate [EPS 0814387]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Warming of the arctic landscape results in permafrost thaw, which causes ground subsidence or thermokarst. Thermokarst formation on hillslopes leads to the formation of thermal erosion features that dramatically alter soil properties and likely affect soil carbon emissions, but such features have received little study in this regard. In order to assess the magnitude and persistence of altered emissions, we use a space-for-time substitution (thaw slump chronosequence) to quantify and compare peak growing season soil carbon dioxide (CO2) fluxes from undisturbed tundra, active, and stabilized thermal erosion features over two seasons. Measurements of soil temperature and moisture, soil organic matter, and bulk density are used to evaluate the factors controlling soil CO2 emissions from each of the three chronosequence stages. Soil CO2 efflux from the active slump is consistently less than half that observed in the undisturbed tundra or stabilized slump (1.8 versus 5.2 g CO2-C m(-2) d(-1) in 2011; 0.9 versus 3.2 g CO2-C m(-2) d(-1) in 2012), despite soil temperatures on the floor of the active slump that are 10-15 degrees C warmer than the tundra and stabilized slump. Environmental factors such as soil temperature and moisture do not exert a strong control on CO2 efflux, rather, local soil physical and chemical properties such as soil organic matter and bulk density, are strongly and inversely related among these chronosequence stages (r(2) = 0.97), and explain similar to 50% of the variation in soil CO2 efflux. Thus, despite profound soil warming and rapid exposure of buried carbon in the active slump, the low organic matter content, lack of stable vegetation, and large increases in the bulk densities in the uppermost portion of active slump soils (up to similar to 2.2 g(-1) cm(-3)) appear to limit CO2 efflux from the active slump. Future studies should assess seasonal fluxes across these features and determine whether soil CO2 fluxes from active features with high organic content are similarly low.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available