4.7 Article

Internal variability of Earth's energy budget simulated by CMIP5 climate models

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/034016

Keywords

heat content; earths energy budget; top-of-atmosphere radiation; surface temperature; climate variability

Funding

  1. UK DECC/Defra Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme [GA01101]
  2. Met Office [NE/K005480/1]
  3. NERC [NE/K005480/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/K005480/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We analyse a large number of multi-century pre-industrial control simulations from the fifth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) to investigate relationships between: net top-of-atmosphere radiation (TOA), globally averaged surface temperature (GST), and globally integrated ocean heat content (OHC) on decadal timescales. Consistent with previous studies, we find that large trends (similar to 0.3 K dec(-1)) in GST can arise from internal climate variability and that these trends are generally an unreliable indicator of TOA over the same period. In contrast, trends in total OHC explain 95% or more of the variance in TOA for two-thirds of the models analysed; emphasizing the oceans' role as Earth's primary energy store. Correlation of trends in total system energy (TE = time integrated TOA) against trends in OHC suggests that for most models the ocean becomes the dominant term in the planetary energy budget on a timescale of about 12 months. In the context of the recent pause in global surface temperature rise, we investigate the potential importance of internal climate variability in both TOA and ocean heat rearrangement. The model simulations suggest that both factors can account for O (0.1 W m(-2)) on decadal timescales and may play an important role in the recently observed trends in GST and 0-700 m (and 0-1800 m) ocean heat uptake.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available